Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2015-12-03, 09:53:15 | version 1.38.0
dentistry 4_2015 cosmetic18 expert article _ soci attivi AIOP 1. Magne P, Schlihchting LH & Baratieri LN (2010) In vitro fatigue of CAD/CAM composite resin and ceramic posterior occlusal veneers. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 104 (3) 149-157. 2. Bindl A, Lùthy H & Mòrmann WH (2006) Strenght and fracture pattern of mo- nolithic CAD/CAM-generated posterior crowns Dental Materials 22(1) 29-36. 3. Lin WS, Harris BT, Ozdemir E & Morton D (2013) Maxillary rehabilitation with a CAD/CAM fabricated, long-term interim and anatomic contour definitive pro- sthesis with a digital workflow: A clinical report Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 110 (1) 144-146. 4. Reich S, Kappe K, Teschner H, Schmitt J. Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia poste- rior fixed dental prostheses. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116-579. 5. Jose Bahilo, Luis Janè, Tissiana Bortolotto, Ivo Krejci, Full-mouth composite rehabilitation of a mixed erosion and attetion patient: A case report with v- shaped veneers and ultra CAD/CAM composite overlays. Quintessence Inter- national 2014 (45), 749-756. 6. Schilichting LH, Maia HP, Baratieri LN, Magne P. Novel-design ultra-thin CAD/ CAM composite resin and ceramic occlusal veneers for the treatment of severe dental erosion. J Prosthetic Dent 2011; 105: 217-226. 7. Donnelly TJ, Burke FJ. In vitro failure of crowns produced by two CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2011;19(3):111-6. 8. Chang CY, Kuo JS, Lin YS & ChangYH (2009) Fracture resistance and failure mo- des of CEREC endo-crowns and conventional post and core-supported CEREC crowns. Journal of Dental Science 4(3) 110-117. 9. Fasbinder DJ (2012) Chairside CAD/CAM: An overview of restorative material options. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 33(1) 52-58. 10. Fritzsche G (2013) Cerec omnicam and the virtual articulator: A case report International Journal of Computerized Dentistry 16 (1) 59-67. 11. Otto T, Schneider D. Long term clinical results of chaired Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 53-59. 12. Fasbinder DJ. The Cerec system: 25 years of chaired CAD/CAM dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2010; 141(Suppl 2): 3S-4S. 13. Fasbinder DJ, Denison JB, Heys D, Neiva G. A clinical evaluation of chairsi- de lithium disilicate CAD/CAM crowns: a two -year report. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141 (Suppl 2):10-4S. 14. Fasbinder DJ, Poticny DJ. Accuracy of occlusal contacts for crowns with chaired CAD/CAM technique. Int J Compute Dent 2010;13(4):303-16. 15. Brawek Pk, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of sin- gle crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow: the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17-2119-25. 16. Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect di- gitalization: A double-blinded, randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Jun 14. 17. Sedda M, Vichi A, Del Siena F, Louca C, Ferrari M. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 2: Outsourcing materials. Am J Dent 2014;27(1):17-22. 18. Seydler B, Rues S, Mùller D, Schmitter M. In vitro fracture load of monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic molar crowns with different wall thicknesses. Clin Oral Investing 2014;18(4): 1165-71. 19. Skouridou N, Pollington S, Rosentritt M, Tsitrou E. Fracture strength of mini- mally prepared all-ceramic CEREC crowns after simulating 5 years of service. Dent Mater 2013;29(6):70-7. 20. Schulties S, Strub Jr, Gerds Ta,Guess PC. Monollithic and bi-layer CAD/CAM lithium-disilicate versus metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: comparison of fracture loads and failure modes after fatigue. Clin Oral Investigation 2013; 17(5): 1407-13. 21. Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2010;31:702-704,706,708-709. 22. Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: An overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012;33:50, 52-58. 23. Spreafico RC, Roulet JF. Posterior composite restorations: Direct or indirect technique. In Roulet JF, Kappert HF. Statements: diagnostics and therapy in dental medicine today and in the future.Quintessence, London 2009: 69-8. 24. Spreafico RC,Krjci,Dietschi, Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semi direct restorations over 3,5 years in vivo. J Dent 2005 Jul; 33(6). 449-507. 25. Bragger U, Lauchenauer D, Lang NP. Surgical lengthening of the clinical crown. J Clin Period 1992;19:58-63. 26. Veneziani M. Adhesive restorations in the posterior area with sub gingival cervical margins: new classifications and differentiated approach. Eur J Esth Dent;spring 2010 vol 5 n. 1:50-76. 27. Ries S,Wolz J,Richter EJ. Effect of Design of All-Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed partial Dentures on clinical Survival Rate. Int J Perio Rest Dent; 2006;26:143- 149. 28. Kern M, Sasse M, Ries S. Ten-year Survival of Anterior All-Ceramic Resin-bon- ded Fixed Dental Prostheses. J Adhes Dent 2011; 13: 407-410. 29. Sasse M, Eschbach S, Kern M. Randomized clinical trial on single retainer all- ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: Influence of the bonding system after up to 55 months. J Dent 2012;40:783-786. 30. Sailer I, Bonani T, brodbeck U., Hammerle CHF. Retrospective Clinic Study of Single-Retainer Cantilever Anterior and Posterior Glass-Ceramic Resin-Bon- ded Fixed Dental Prostheses at a Mean Follow-up of 6 Years. Int J Perio Rest Dent 2013; 26:443-450. 31. Sailer I, Hammerle CHF. Zirconia ceramic single-Retainer Resin-Bonded Fixed Dental Prostheses (RBFDPs) After 4 Years of Clinical Service: A retrospective Clinical and Volumetric Study.Int J Perio Rest Dent 2014;34:333-343. _bibliografia _Conclusioni Le tecniche CAD/CAM chairside garan- tiscono risultati validi sia dal punto di vista estetico sia da quello funzionale e sono fa- cilmente riproducibili in virtù di un controllo della morfologia attuabile con il computer e non dipendente dalla manualità dell’operatore. Inoltre, la possibilità di restaurare in un singo- lo appuntamento riduce i costi e il discomfort del paziente. L’articolo è stato pubblicato su CAD/CAM Italian Edition, settembre 2015. Fig. 5m_Visione linguale dopo cementazione adesiva. Fig. 5n_Visione vestibolare dopo cementazione adesiva. Fig. 5m Fig. 5n