Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

CAD/CAM international magazine of digital dentistry No. 4, 2016

Careful planning is indispensable in the treatment of an edentulous jaw with implant-supported res- torations. The axes and positions of the implants must correspond to the given biological, mechani- cal and aesthetic conditions. In situations in which severe bone recession has occurred, the work of the dental team has to involve the reconstruction of the dental and the gingival tissue. The flawless reconstruction of gingival tissue requires sound teamwork,aswellasexcellentmaterialsandexcep- tional skill. Layering with the light-curing labora- tory composite SR Nexco (Ivoclar Vivadent) takes this procedure to a new level. A 37-year-old female patient presented to our practice with her teeth and the surrounding bone structure in very poor condition (Figs. 1 & 2). Numerous teeth were missing from both the upper and lower jaws. In addition, the upper jaw showed considerable bone and gingival resorption. The patient wished to have her teeth restored to regain an attractive appearance. Owing to the extensive damage, complete restoration of both jaws with implants was indicated. Surgical phase Owing to the sufficient bone structure in the lower jaw,thispartofthemouthcouldberestoredatonce with four immediately loadable implants. During the reconstructive phase, the upper jaw had to be treated with a provisional removable denture owing to the atrophied alveolar ridge. The tooth extractions from the upper and lower jaw were | case report implant-supported restoration 22 CAD/CAM 4 2016 Aesthetic composite layering of implant-supported restorations in an edentulous jaw A good option for the lifelike recreation of gingival tissue Authors: Drs Patrice Margossian & Pierre Andrieu, France Fig. 1: Initial photograph of the patient. Fig. 2: Extremely poor oral condition: The teeth could not be saved. The alveolar ridge in the upper jaw was considerably atrophied. Fig. 3: After bone augmentation, ten implants were placed. The photograph shows the situation prior to the prosthetic phase. Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3 42016

Pages Overview