case report | 4 5 6 Case 2—Fig. 4: Initial periapical radiograph. Fig. 5: Immediate post-op periapical radiograph. Fig. 6: One-year follow-up periapical radiograph. treatment, the materials used for obturation, the pres- ence of ledges or separated instruments, intricate root canal anatomy, and the use of fibre-reinforced or metal posts. When approaching retreatment, it is helpful to divide the process into stages, addressing each challenge systematically from the coronal portion towards the apex. By tackling obstacles individually, we can effectively manage the procedure, ensuring all aspects are ad- dressed and our ultimate goal is achieved. If a metal or fibre-reinforced post is present, careful consideration must be given to the remaining thickness of the dentinal walls. Ultrasonic instruments are invaluable for removing hard materials, and in high-risk scenarios, microsurgery may be warranted. In this article, I will focus on a simplified technique for removing gutta-percha, utilising nickel–titanium rotary files and demonstrate by way of clinical cases. Addition- ally, I will discuss the limitations of this approach and when it is necessary to employ alternative techniques based on specific obstacles encountered during re- treatment. For retreatment, I utilise the Traverse and ZenFlex files (Kerr Dental). Specifically, I employ the 25/.08 Traverse orifice opener of 17 mm in length, alongside the 35/.06, 30/.06 and 25/.06 ZenFlex files (Fig. 1). These files boast a unique variable heat treatment, sharp cutting edges and a design of the flutes, making them ideal for both initial endodontic procedures and retreatment. In a step-by-step approach, this sequence is designed for the removal of previous gutta-percha from within the root canal. Firstly, using the 25/.08 Traverse file at a speed of 800 rpm, a small pecking motion is applied. Typically, two or three motions are sufficient to establish an entry point and remove the coronal portion of the gutta- percha. The file is allowed to reach its maximum depth without additional pressure. Subsequently, the 35/.06 ZenFlex file is employed, following the same gentle picking motion. Each movement extends 2–3 mm, lasts only a couple of seconds and is repeated around three times. “When approaching retreatment, it is helpful to divide the process into stages, addressing each challenge systematically [...].” The 35/.06 file is succeeded by the 30/.06 file and, if necessary, the 25/.06 file to ensure complete removal of gutta-percha from the canal. Should an obstacle be encountered, particularly in mesial canals with severe curvatures, switching to the 4% taper ZenFlex files is advised. The same crown-down technique and file sizes are maintained throughout the procedure. I employ a comprehensive sequence of irrigation, which has been previously published.1 7 Case 3—Fig. 7: Initial periapical radiograph. roots 1 2024 35