| case report Computer-aided, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible Dr Thomas Spielau, Uli Hauschild, Germany & Dr Joannis Katsoulis, Switzerland Background Computer-aided implantology (CAI) was introduced more than 25 years ago with the aim of facilitating implant plan- ning and avoiding intra-operative complications such as mandibular nerve damage, sinus perforation, fenestra- tion and dehiscence.1–4 Based on a computed tomog- raphy (CT) scan and a digitised tooth set-up, the pros- thetically ideal implant positions can be planned virtually with the help of guided surgery software, allowing for 3D visualisation prior to implant surgery.2, 5, 6 Furthermore, the possibility of transferring the virtually planned implant position to the real clinical situation is provided by a stereolithographically fabricated surgical template.3, 7 While only few guided implant placement systems were available at the time, today, multiple CAI programmes are available on the market. Several in vitro, cadaver and clinical studies have reported on the accu- racy of guided implant placement.8–10 Although the cur- rent state of software and hardware technology has im- proved, inaccuracies in implant placement may occur and these depend on different factors, such as the tem- plate support (bone, mucosa, teeth, implants), intrinsic factors of the surgical guide (tolerance in diameter be- tween the drill and the guide sleeve, fabrication accu- racy of the guide)11, 12 and human-related factors during the workflow of virtual planning and guided surgery.7, 13 The guided surgery approach is still a matter of contro- versy,14–16 even though the procedure may be performed Fig. 1 Fig. 1: Panoramic radiograph of the initial dental status. 36 CAD/CAM 1 2020 in a safe and predictable way.17, 18 However, a systematic and concise approach to performing the single steps in the treatment sequence may allow for more accurate im- plant positioning, as the type of guide and fixation have an important influence.19, 20 Additionally, the use of mul- tiple templates with different supports, that is teeth and implant support, combined in a sequenced order is be- lieved to improve accuracy compared with a mucosa- supported approach alone.21 While some patients wish to be informed in detail about the specific treatment steps, most want to know whether they would have to leave the dental office without teeth at some point of the treatment. In this context, immediate implant placement after tooth extraction and immediate implant loading with a fixed provisional restoration may help the patient, as the time after extraction and osseo- integration is consolidated. In guided surgery protocols, minimally invasive placement and immediate loading have been possible treatment steps from the begin- ning.3, 4 Postoperative morbidity after flapless surgery is significantly reduced compared with the traditional open approach, especially in edentulous patients.17, 22, 23 Later during the treatment, restorations fabricated with the help of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture (CAD/CAM) provide high-quality and aesthetic materi- als. Although CAI and CAD/CAM procedures have fa- cilitated a straightforward workflow in the rehabilitation of edentulous patients, immediate implant placement and immediate loading protocols combined are complex and required a high level of organisation between the im- plantologist, the technician and the patient. The aim of the present case report was to illustrate the feasibility of a combined immediate implant placement and loading approach using CAI in the rehabilitation of a patient with a partially dentate mandible and who requested a compre- hensive treatment and, specifically, one that would not leave her edentulous at any point. Initial status and treatment concept The partially dentate 74-year-old patient presented with masticatory problems due a removable partial den-