interview | Where, in your opinion, is the line drawn between the general dentist’s and the hygienist’s competences, and when is the intervention of a periodontist nec- essary? Most periodontal problems can be solved by implementing non-surgical methods. This means that a well-performed hygiene procedure, consisting of deep scaling, systematic cleaning of periodontal pockets, and removal of biofilm and dental plaque is the key to success. Such work can be done by teams consisting of dentists and hygienists. There is a practical indicator to help in diagnosis, the Periodontal Screening and Recording index, a modifi- cation of the community periodontal index of treatment needs, which should be used by each practitioner. This test helps to place the patient in a specific group requir- ing basic treatment and to distinguish him from a patient already requiring the intervention of a periodontist. The scale indicates: (1) bleeding during probing, (2) the pres- ence of calculus, (3) the presence of periodontal pockets from 3.5 mm to 5.5 mm in depth, and (4) the presence of periodontal pockets above 6 mm deep. It is assumed that the first two groups of patients on the four-point scale are eligible for treatment by dentists without specialisation and that, when the pocket depth of 3.5 mm is exceeded, patients require a specialist’s treatment. The device men- tioned above indicates many possibilities in this range, and as a result, prophylaxis reaches a much higher level. When I hear conversations about prophylaxis, I as- sume that the greater the patients’ awareness is, the smaller the number of difficult cases resulting from years of negligence there will be. Isn’t there a conflict between prophylaxis and profitability? In the West, periodontal diseases were very much un- der control; however, the recent wave of immigration has changed the statistics. For example, Scandinavia, a region where prophylaxis was at the highest level, was flooded with immigrants. It changed the situation a great deal. Owing to the fact that there had been no difficult cases of periodontal diseases, there were no specialists who were able to deal with this new situation. Now, they have to face these problems and perhaps learn about many issues anew. Primary prophylaxis among patients with active disease may decrease, but there is also secondary prophylaxis, which refers to those patients who have recovered from the disease. In their case, prevention is very difficult. If the patient has recovered from an advanced disease, GBT makes it easier for us to maintain the treatment results. However, we need to help patients because, owing to the periodontal loss and therefore difficult local conditions, maintaining good hygiene at home is difficult for them. For many years to come, we will still meet many patients with periodontal diseases and caries. These problems are caused not only by the fast pace of life but also by the low awareness of oral hygiene in those countries where medicine is less developed. It is interesting that periodon- tal problems equally concern those patients with a good awareness of hygiene rules and who sometimes even excessively follow the recommendations and those who are not able to implement even basic hygiene methods. Therefore, what strategy should be adopted to fight against periodontal diseases? Let’s take a look at the example of the comprehensive treatment of non-carious cervical lesions, including ab- fraction or abrasion. Nowadays, most dentists deal with functional disorders. One of Zucchelli’s practical con- cepts is that we must first find the reason for a problem and then combine the restorative treatment of cavities with periodontal coverage of recessions. This concept is highly complicated, but it helps the patients a great deal. “For many years to come, we will still meet many patients with periodontal diseases and caries.” The number of patients who have recovered is growing. The effects of this therapy are good-looking teeth, un- exposed roots and lack of hypersensitivity. The conclu- sion is clear: even if one problem seems to be finished, you need to keep your eyes open because another may have just begun. What conditions, in your opinion, should be met so that patient–hygienist–dentist cooperation can be fully effective? How can success be achieved in the whole process of hygienic care and then be main- tained at a satisfactory level for as long as possible? The prerequisite for effective therapy is the profes- sional supragingival and subgingival hygienic procedure. Supplementation with vitamin D3 is increasingly being scientifically documented and is also recommended by Polskie Towarzystwo Stomatologiczne (the Polish associ- ation of stomatology), mainly by Prof. Marzena Dominiak, who discusses this subject in many lectures. Basic (non-surgical) therapy is crucial. I’m totally opposed to implementing physical therapy, for example laser therapy, pocket rinsing, PerioChip and ozone therapy, if we don’t start with the basic therapy. I recommend such activities, but only if the basic hygiene procedure has been previously performed. This is where the con- cept of GBT works perfectly. prevention 1 2021 23