to the specific gingival situation generated a great deal of very positive feedback. This interest, combined with the fact that the demand for digital solutions is already very great, made it possible for us to achieve an even better start than we expected. Customers and users with whom we have long-standing, close relationships natu- rally knew about our project at an early stage and were involved in product and process optimisation. Not only did they support us in this project, but they also con- firmed that there will almost certainly be great demand for the new competence centre in future. The word “future” brings us to the next question. Will the digital workflow at Zeramex offer even more options in future? Are you already working on fur- ther developments in the Zeramex Digital Solutions department, and if so, what form will these take? Hunn: I thought you might put this question to me [laughs]. Indeed, there are product enhancements that are already in development and, in some cases, almost completed. In the near future, the competence centre will certainly provide users with innovations as well as enhancements of existing products. Of course, I cannot yet tell you ex- actly what these will be. In addition to the product, deliv- ery times are an issue. We are already working intensively on offering the customer shorter delivery times as soon as possible. The aim is that, in future, Zeramex Digital Solutions products will be received by the customer within two days of placing the order. Mr Hölldampf, you are the laboratory manager at Geiger Dentaltechnik, one of the longest estab- lished machining centres in southern Germany and a close partner of Zeramex. In 2000, your labora - tory was the first in Germany to use 3M ESPE to im- plement a pilot project for milling zirconium dioxide with CNC machines which operated on a CAD/CAM basis. What can you tell us about this material, the machining process and your experience with it? Hölldampf: Yes, that was very exciting back then. Zirco- nium dioxide was still in its infancy, and when 3M, then ESPE, came to us to test this new process, we were ini- tially quite sceptical about whether it would work. In the test phase, we realised that the material zirconium di- oxide was unique and functioned really well and that it would, therefore, be possible to do quite a lot with it. Of course, zirconium dioxide has its pitfalls, and there are a few things to consider when preparing and machining it. At the end of the day, zirconium dioxide is a ceramic. This means that you have to carefully investigate factors like stability values, connector cross sections for bridges and the creation of the correct substrate for subsequent veneering ceramics. There are many factors that come into play. Extremely precise processing must be ensured over all the manufacturing steps. In the past, full-ceramic restorations were really only possible using pressed ce- ramics or the hot isostatic pressed variant. Milling in the interview | green state, however, was a complete innovation. This new approach was gentle on the material, the machine and the milling tool. In addition, it was possible to achieve much more detailed and precise results. It is said that stability is still an issue with zirconium dioxide. You have been working with this material for over 20 years. What is your opinion about its stability? Hölldampf: Zirconium dioxide is a very hard material. If we take a gold crown for comparison, it is much more for- giving in terms of chipping. This is because gold is much more malleable than ceramic. For the ceramic process, this means that an absolutely perfect impression is re- quired in advance. If uncertainties are already present in the impression, this can lead to inaccuracies, and there is a risk of parts of it breaking off. Since pressure cannot be used to apply zirconium dioxide restorations, a per- fect fit must be assured. A gold matrix is more forgiving. Because zirconium dioxide is such a hard material, the product has to be extremely precise and a perfect fit, as I said. The fit is the absolutely crucial. In the further course of machining, it is also important to process it carefully without pressure and with the right cooling. Especially in the area of the geometry of implant connections, it is important to use extremely stable ceramic material. The pressure on a natural tooth is simply very different from that on an implant. An implant is firmly anchored in the bone and allows practically no further movement. Are there still problems with fitting with zirconium dioxide, and does this require a lot of reworking? 2 Fig. 2: Peter Hölldampf is the laboratory manager at Geiger Dentaltechnik, one of the longest established machining centres in southern Germany. 43 2 2020