case report References: 1. Noelken R, Neffe BA, Kunkel M, Wagner W. Maintenance of marginal bone support and soft tissue esthetics at im- mediately provisionalized OsseoSpeed™ implants placed into extraction sites: 2-year results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(2):214-220. 2. Lau SL, Chow J, Li W, Chow LK. Classification of Maxillary Central Incisors —Implications for Immediate Implant in the Esthetic Zone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(1):142-153. 3. Guirado JL, Troiano M, López-López PJ, Ramírez-Fernan- dez MP, de Val JE, Marin JM, Gehrke SA. Different con- figuration of socket shield technique in peri-implant bone preservation: An experimental study in dog mandible. Ann Anat. 2016;208:109-115. 4. Siormpas KD, Mitsias ME, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Garber D, Kotsakis GA. Immediate implant placement in the es- thetic zone utilizing the “root-membrane” technique: clinical results up to 5 years postloading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im- plants 2014;29(6):1397-1405. 5. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Immediate nonfunctional versus immediate functional loading and den- tal implant failure rates: a systematic review and meta-ana- lysis. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1052-1059. 6. Tan WL, Wong TLT, Wong MCM, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res.2012;23(5):1-21. 7. Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. Does ridge preservation following tooth extrac- tion improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic re- view. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2015;26 (11):180-201. 8. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2005;32:212-218. 9. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC.Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:43-61. 10. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M.Influence of the 3-D bone- -to-implant relationship on esthetics.Int J Periodontics Re- storative Dent. 2005 Apr;25(2):113-9. 11. Ferrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J.Factors influencing ridge alterations following im- mediate implant placement into extraction sockets.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Jan;21(1):22-9. 12. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC.A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical out- comes and esthetic results.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Oct;18(5):552-62. 13. El Nahass H, Naiem SN. Analysis of the Dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam compu- ted tomography study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2015;26:57-61. 14. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Clinical outcomes of GBR proce- dures to correct peri-implant dehiscences and fenestrations: a systematic review. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2009;20(4):113-123. 15. Moraschini V, Barboza E dos SP. Quality assessment of sys- tematic reviews onalveolar socket preservation. Int. J.Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016;45:1126-1134. 16. Milinkovic I, Cordaro L. Are there specific indications for the different alveolar bone augmentation procedures for implant placement? A systematic review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2014;43:606-625. 17. Willenbacher M, Al-Nawas B, Berres M, Kämmerer PW, Schiegnitz E. The Effects of Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Re- search 2016;18:1248-1268. 18. Saeidi Pour R, Zuhr O, Hürzeler M, Prandtner O, Rafael CF, Edelhoff D, Liebermann A. Clinical Benefits of the Immedia- te Implant Socket Shield Technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:93-101. 19. Davarpanah M, Szmukler-Moncler S. Unconventional im- plant treatment: I. Implant placement in contact with ankylo- sed root fragments. A series of five case reports. Clin. Oral Impl. Res 2009;20:851-856. 20. Mitsias ME, Siormpas KD, Kontsiotou-Siormpa E, Prasad H, Garber D, Kotsakis GA. A Step-by-Step Description of PDL-Mediated Ridge Preservation for Immediate Implant Rehabilitation in the Esthetic Region. Int J Periodontics Re- storative Dent. 2015;35(6):835-841. 21. Hürzeler MB, Zuhr O, Schupbach P, Rebele SF, Emmanouili- dis N, Fickl S. The socket shield technique: a proof-of-prin- ciple report. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37: 855-862. 22. Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Schneider D, Schupbach P, Hürzeler M. The Socket-Shield Technique: First Histological, Clinical, and Volumetrical Observations after Separation of the Buccal Tooth Segment – A Pilot Study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2015;17:71-82. 23. Bäumer D, Zuhr O, Rebele S, Hürzeler M. Socket Shield Technique for immediate implant placement – clinical, ra- diographic and volumetric data after 5 years. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 2017;00:1–9. 24. Sclar AG. Guidelines for flapless surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(1):20-32. 25. Lima LA, Fuchs-Wehrle AM, Lang NP, Hämmerle CHF, Li- berti E, Pompeu E, Todescan JH. Surface characteristics of implants influence their bone integration after simultaneous placement of implant and GBR membrane. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 14, 2003;14:669–679. 26. Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB.Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation andbuccal overbuilding: an animal stu- dy. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:442–448. 27. Blanco J, Nunez V, Aracil L, Munoz F, Ramos I. Ridge altera- tions following immediate implant placement in the dog: flap versus flapless surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:640–648. 28. Szmukler-Moncler S, Davarpanah M, Davarpanah K, Capel- le-Ouadah N, Demurashvili G, Rajzbaum P. Unconventional Implant Placement Part III: Implant Placement Encroaching upon Residual Roots – A Report of Six Cases. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2015;17:396–405. 29. Miltiadis E. Mitsias, Konstantinos D. Siormpas, Georgios A. Kotsakis, Scott D. Ganz,Carlo Mangano, Giovanna Iezzi. The Root Membrane Technique: Human Histologic Eviden- ce after Five Years of Function. BioMed Research Internatio- nal 2017 (in press). 44 implants 4 2018