Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2018-02-14, 12:02:22 | version 1.38.0
P e r i i m p l a n t s o f t - t i s s u e a n d b o n e l e v e l s w i t h d i f f e r e n t i m p l a n t n e c k d e s i g n s 22. Albrektsson T, Buser D, Chen ST, Cochran D, DeBruyn H, Jemt T, Koka S, Nevins M, Sennerby L, Simion M, Taylor TD, Wennerberg A. Statements from the Estepona consensus meeting on peri-implantitis, February 2–4, 2012. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):781–2. 23. Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic comparison of Astra Tech and Brånemark single tooth implants. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000 Apr;2(2):78–84. 24. Hallman M, Mordenfeld A, Strandkvist T. A retrospective 5-year follow-up study of two different titanium implant surfaces used after interpositional bone grafting for reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005 Jul;7(3):121–6. 25. Karlsson U, Gotfredsen K, Olsson C. A 2-year report on maxillary and mandibular fixed partial dentures supported by Astra Tech dental implants. A comparison of 2 implants with different surface textures. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Aug;9(4):235–42. 26. Van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000 Jun;11(3):202–9. 27. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang H. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Feb;21(2):129–36. 15. Peñarrocha M, Palomar M, Sanchis JM, Guarinos J, Balaguer J. Radiologic study of marginal bone loss around 108 dental implants and its relationship to smoking, implant location, and morphology. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Nov–Dec;19(6):861–7. 16. Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Oct;10(5):394–405. 17. Tan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized- controlled clinical trial. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jan;22(1):14–9. 18. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:68–81. 19. Baldi D, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Pera P. Plaque accumulation on exposed titanium surfaces and peri-implant tissue behavior. A preliminary 1-year clinical study. → Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Sep–Oct;22(5):447–55. 20. Piao CM, Lee JE, Koak JY, Kim SK, Rhyu IC, Han CH, Herr Y, Heo SJ. Marginal bone loss around three different implant systems: radiographic evaluation after 1 year. → J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Oct;36(10):748–54. 21. Hänggi MP, Hänggi DC, Schoolfield JD, Meyer J, Cochran DL, Hermann JS. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: a retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths. → J Periodontol. 2005 May;76(5):791–802. 28. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:207–15. 29. Zechner W, Trinkl N, Watzak G, Busenlechner D, Tepper G, Haas R, Watzek G. Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar–Apr;19(2):216–21. 30. Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. → J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1412–24. 31. Stein AE, McGlmphy EA, Johnston WM, Larsen PE. Effects of implant design and surface roughness on crestal bone and soft tissue levels in the esthetic zone. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Sep–Oct;24(5):910–9. 32. Schwarz F, Herten M, Bieling K, Becker J. Crestal bone changes at nonsubmerged implants (Camlog) with different machined collar lengths: a histomorphometric pilot study in dogs. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar–Apr;23(2):335–42. 33. Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Aug;15(4):413–20. 34. Den Hartog L, Meijer HJ, Stegenga B, Tymstra N, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Single implants with different neck designs in the aesthetic zone: a randomized clinical trial. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Nov;22(11):1289–97. 35. Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Apr;9(2):91–9. 36. Deppe H, Horch H, Kolk A. Microstructured dental implants and palatal mucosal grafts in cleft patients: a retrospective analysis. → J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004 Aug;32(4):211–5. 37. Song D, Lee DW, Kim CK, Park KH, Moon IS. Comparative analysis of peri-implant marginal bone loss based on microthread location: a 1-year prospective study after loading. → J Periodontol. 2009 Dec;80(12):1937–44. 38. Van de Velde T, Collaert B, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible. → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2010 Jun 1;12(2):134–41. 39. Aloy-Prósper A, Maestre-Ferrin L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Marginal bone loss in relation to the implant neck surface: an update. → Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May;16(3):e365–8. 40. Cosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Wilde P, De Rouck T. Two-piece implants with turned versus microtextured collars. → J Periodontol. 2007 Sep;78(9):1657–63. 41. Brägger U, Häfeli U, Huber B, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non- submerged dental implants. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Aug;9(4):218–24. Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 3 | Issue 4/2017 23