Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

implants _ international magazine of oral implantology No. 3, 2017

D A Titanium PEEK p value PM-BC Mean ± Sd 2.74 ± 0.41 3.11 ± 0.26 * 0.032 Median 2.74 3.11 PM-LC Mean ± Sd 2.91 ± 0.03 3.71 ± 0.18 * 0.008 Median 2.91 3.71 PM buccal-IS Mean ± Sd 2.35 ± 0.87 2.95 ± 0.53 * 0.015 Median 2.35 2.95 PM lingual-IS Mean ± Sd 2.65 ± 0.43 3.57 ± 0.38 * 0.003 Median 2.65 3.57 IS-BC Mean ± Sd 2.04 ± 0.11 * 1.53 ± 0.21 0.011 Median 2.04 1.53 Shortest Implants – Longest History. Think Short! IS-LC Mean ± Sd 1.93 ± 0.14 * 1.41 ± 0.19 0.029 For more than 30 years Bicon® short implants Median 1.93 1.41 Table 3 are unchanged in clinical use. Linear measurements in millimetre: PM-BC: distance from the peri-implant mucosa to the buccal bone crest; PM-LC: distance from the peri-implant mucosa to the lingual bone crest; PM buccal-IS: distance from peri-implant mucosa to the implant shoul- der in the buccal aspect; PM lingual-IS: distance from peri-implant mucosa to the implant shoulder in the lingual aspect; IS-BC: distance from the top of the implant shoulder to the first bone-to-implant contact in the buccal aspect; IS-LC: distance from the top of the implant shoulder to the lingual bone crest. Values as mean ± Sd and median. Tab. 3: Non-parametric Friedman test to related samples. (*) Significant differences with p < 0.05. Rationale for platform switching The switch in implant platform diame- ter prevents apical migration of the epi- thelial attachment and soft-tissue in- growth at the top of the platform by reducing bacterial migration and, conse- quently, of soft-tissue ingrowth and peri-implant bone loss. Marginal bone loss is drastically reduced and the objective criteria for peri-implant inflam- mation are greatly improved.22 Human study Table 5 lists clinical parameters from human studies at one, three and five months. Figures 3a to h show radiological findings at one, three and five months. Figures 4a and b show the customisation of a SKY elegance abutment. Rationale for single-stage treatments Successive insertions and reconnec- tions when restoring an implant accord- ing to conventional protocols provoke bacterial invasion and colonisation of the biological space and mark the onset of marginal bone loss. Offering treat- ment in a single session provides the biological benefits described and saves time and money, increasing patient sat- isfaction.23 Intraoral scanning Fabricating a CEREC crown requires a step prior to intraoral scanning, namely the adaptation of the prosthetic sup- port. The SKY elegance abutment can be cut and customised in the mouth, more or less like dentin, which means a reduc- tion in time and cost. Also required are a delicate surface polish and prepara- tion of the profiles to be recognised by the intraoral scanner. The restoration margins should be well-defined and prepared to the gingival or subgingival level.24, 25 The SKY elegance abutment anatomy allows to create a proper emer- gency profile that can be customised for According to the 11th European Consensus Conference (EuCC) 2016 in Cologne, provided the specific treatment parameters are ob- served, the use of short, angulated or diam- eter-reduced implants in sites with reduced bone volume can be a reliable treatment option, given the risks associated with the use of standard-dimension implants in combina- tion with augmentation procedures. For more Information: Bicon Europe Ltd. Hauptstr. 1 55491 Buechenbeuren Germany Phone +49 (0)6543 818200 germany@bicon.com www.bicon.de.com Popular sizes: 3x6, 3x8, 3.5x8, 4x5, 4x6, 4x8, 4x11, 4.5x6, 4.5x8, 5x5, 5x6, 5x8, 6x5, 6x6, 6x8 mm

Pages Overview