Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2017-10-13, 10:01:15 | version 1.38.0
A c c u r a c y o f c o m p u t e r - a s s i s t e d i m p l a n t p l a c e m e n t Fig. 6 Schematic diagram of the measurement of deviations between planned and placed implants. Fig. 7 Postoperative intraoral digital impression. Fig. 6 Fig. 7 S t a t i s t i c a l a n a l y s i s Patient data were collected in a Numbers spreadsheet (Version 3.6.1 for Mac OS X 10.11.4). A biostatistician with expertise in dentistry ana- lyzed the data using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0, IBM, Armonk, N.Y., U.S.) for statistical analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed for numeric parameters using mean ± standard deviation and median with a 95% confidence interval. Template-related complications between the two groups were compared using the Fisher exact probability test. The mean differences in the overall deviation in the clinical outcomes compared with the virtual plan were compared between groups using a mixed-design repeated- measures analysis of variance model. All statis- tical comparisons were conducted with a P value set at 0.05. Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 3 | Issue 3/2017 13