Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2017-06-02, 10:40:19 | version 1.38.0
K i n e s i o g r a p h i c e v a l u a t i o n i n o r t h o d o n t i c p a t i e n t s treatment scheme formed and accomplished will be. Overall, orthodontic treatment planning, with or without extraction, is supposed to take into account not only morphological parameters but also parameters vital for function. Functional investigation of patients should be extensive and applied in current orthodontic practice. edentia, problems were registered during man- dibular movements. These problems were mainly related to the restriction of mandibular movement during lowering and lifting, of later- al movement and of muscle contraction speed. Moreover, TMD was reported. Improvements were seen with the regain and restoration of the edentulous spaces. Conclusion In all of the groups examined after orthodontic treatment that included dentition size and shape reduction for partial primary or secondary tooth The present study was self-funded. All of the au- thors declare no conflict of interests. Competing interests References 1. Chua AL, Lim JY, Lubit EC. The effect of extraction versus nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the growth of the lower anterior face height. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Oct;104(4):361–8. 8. Kumari, M, Fida M. Vertical facial and dental arch dimensional changes in extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic treatment. → J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2010 Jan;20(1):17–21. 2. Cusimano C, Mc Laughlin RP, Zernik JH. Effect of first bicuspid extractions on facial height in high-angle cases. → J Clin Orthod. 1993 Nov;27(11):594–8. 9. Mair A, Hunder WS. Mandibular growth direction with conventional Class II nonextraction treatment. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992 Jun;101(6):543–49. 3. Drobocky OB, Smith RJ. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with extraction of four first premolars. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Mar;95(3):220–30. 10. Mew J. Facial changes in identical twins treated by different orthodontic techniques. → World J Orthod. 2007 Summer;8(2):174–88. 4. Jones G, Buschang PH, Kim KB, Oliver DR. Class II non-extraction patients treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device versus intermaxillary elastics. → Angle Orthod. 2008 Mar;78(2):332–8. 11. Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U. Class II correction in patients treated with Class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Aug;118(2):142–9. 5. Akinci Cansunar H, Uysal T. Comparison of orthodontic treatment outcomes in nonextraction, 2 maxillary premolar extrac- tion, and 4 premolar extraction protocols with the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 May;145(5):595–602. 6. Konstantonis D. The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions. → Angle Orthod. 2012 Mar;82(2):209–17. 7. Konstantonis D, Anthopoulou C, Makou M. Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions. → Prog Orthod. 2013 Nov 19;14:47. doi:10.1186/2196- 1042-14-47. 12. Park S, Kudlick E, Abrahamian A. Vertical dimensional changes of the lips following four first premolar extractions in the North American Black. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Mar;95(3):270–1. 13. Sivakumar A, Valiathan A. Cephalometric assessment of dentofacial vertical changes in Class I subjects with and without extraction. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):869–75. 14. Staggers JA. A comparison of results of second molar and first premolar extraction treatment. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990 Nov;98(5):430–6. 15. Staggers JA. Vertical changes following first premolar extractions. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Jan;105(1):19–24. 16. Stromboni Y. Facial aesthetics in orthodontic treatment with and without extractions. → Eur J Orthod. 1979;1(3):201–6. 17. Kim TK, Kim JT, Mah J, Yang WS, Baek SH. First or second premolar extraction effects on facial vertical dimension. → Angle Orthod. 2005 Mar;75(2):177–82. 18. Travess H, Roberts-Harry D, Sandy G. Orthodontics. Part 8: extractions in orthodontics. → Br Dent J. 2004 Feb 28;196(4):195–203. 19. Tulley WJ. The role of extractions in orthodontic treatment. → Br Dent J. 1959;107:199–205. 20. Yamaguchi K, Nanda RS. The effects of extraction and nonextraction treatment on the mandibular position. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Nov;100(5):443–52. 21. Clauzade M, Marty JP. Orthoposturodontie. Perpignan: Éditions SEOO; 1998. 22. Clauzade M, Marty JP. Orthoposturodontie 2. Perpignan: Éditions SEOO; 2006. 23. Cesaretti G, Gobbi G. Affidabilità e riproducibilità dell’ esame kinesiografico [Internet]. → San Benedetto del Tronto. 2013 Oct [cited 2017 May 17]. Available from: https://drive.google.com/ file/d/0BxWIqv7tas3tb1NXX2k1eG- NzSWM/view. 24. Klimova T. Study of mandible movements in patients with physiologic and distal occlusion, in different age groups, using the kinesiographic method [thesis]. [Moscow]: Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 2010. 25. Baumrind S. Adult orthodontic therapy: extraction versus non-extraction. → Clin Orthod Res. 1998 Nov;1(2):130–41. 26. Germeç D, Taner T. Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadole- scent borderline patients. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):539–49. 27. Saelens NA, De Smit AA. Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment. → Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):225–36. 28. Baumrind S, Korn E, Boyd R, Maxwell R. The decision to extract: Part 1—interclinician agreement. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Mar;109(3):297–309. 29. Baumrind S, Korn E, Boyd R, Maxwell R. The decision to extract: Part II. Analysis of clinicians’ stated reasons for extraction. → Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996 Apr;109(4):393–402. 30. Allan D, Woods M. Arch-dimensional changes in non-extraction cases with finishing wires of a particular material, size and arch form. → Aust Orthod J. 2015 May;31(1):26–36. 31. Haddad S, Kerbrat JB, Schouman T, Goudot P. [Effect of dental arch length decrease during orthodontic treatment in the upper airway develop- ment. A review]. → Orthod Fr. 2017 Mar;88(1):25–33. French. Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 3 | Issue 2/2017 51