Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2017-03-17, 12:34:42 | version 1.38.0
D A V i s i t u s @ I D S H a l l 4 . 2 B o o t h G 070 / J 07 9 overview | Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6 Fig. 3: After implant integration. – Fig. 4: OPG 1999. – Fig. 5: Check-up 2016. – Fig. 6: OPG 2016. ing that the bifurcation at 46 and 36 hat in- creased minimally since the beginning of the treatment (Figs. 1–6). bridge 16 to 26 in the maxilla and exclusively implant-based crowns and an extension bridge in the left mandible. In conclusion, this case proved to be ideal —long-term stability and a both motivated and cooperative patient. Case 2 Shortly before his 60th birthday, a univer- sity professor wanted to end his state of suf- fering from an edentulous maxilla and a partly edentulous mandible. Most of all, he wanted to exchange his total prosthesis in the maxilla and partial prosthesis in the man- dible for fixed dentures. There were no regular controll sessions, as the patient did not attend these in 2003, 2005 und 2008. In 2009, we achieved that he attended one control date and one profes- sional hygiene session at least once every year. X-ray controls and intraoral examinations did not indicate any decrease in the constitu- tion of the residual dentition or implants (Figs. 7–14). Thirteen implants were inserted in two sessions and loaded with a continuous In conclusion, this case exhibits long-term stability of fixed, implant-based dentures and only partial compliance of the patient. Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9 Fig. 10 Fig. 7: OPG after Implantation 1996. – Fig. 8: Mandible after implant integration 1996. – Fig. 9: Maxilla after implant integration 1996. – Fig. 10: Frontal view 1996. Shortest Implants – Longest History. Think Short! For more than 30 years Bicon® short implants are unchanged in clinical use. According to the 11th European Consensus Conference (EuCC) 2016 in Cologne, provided the specific treatment parameters are ob- served, the use of short, angulated or diam- eter-reduced implants in sites with reduced bone volume can be a reliable treatment option, given the risks associated with the use of standard-dimension implants in combina- tion with augmentation procedures. For more Information: Bicon Europe Ltd. Hauptstr. 1 55491 Buechenbeuren Germany Phone +49 (0)6543 818200 germany@bicon.com www.bicon.de.com Popular sizes: 3x6, 3x8, 3.5x8, 4x5, 4x6, 4x8, 4x11, 4.5x6, 4.5x8, 5x5, 5x6, 5x8, 6x5, 6x6, 6x8 mm