Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2017-01-11, 10:22:38 | version 1.38.0
Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 2 | Issue 4/2016 73 E f f e c t s o f i n s e r t i o n t o r q u e o n h a r d a n d s o f t t i s s u e a f t e r t w o y e a r s 1. Campos FE, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, Barbosa DZ, Oliveira MT, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Are insertion torque and early osseointegration proportional? A histologic evaluation. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Nov;26(11):1256–60. 2. Szmukler-Moncler S, Salama H, Reingewirtz Y, Dubruille JH. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature. → J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Summer;43(2):192–203. 3. Duyck J, Roesems R, Cardoso MV, Ogawa T, De Villa Camargos G, Vandamme K. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):191–6. 4. Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Giro G, Janal MN, Coelho PG. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Jan;23(1):113–8. 5. Jimbo R, Anchieta R, Baldassarri M, Granato R, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Tovar N, Vandeweghe S, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Histomorphometry and bone mechanical property evolution around different implant systems at early healing stages: an experimental study in dogs. → Implant Dent. 2013 Dec;22(6):596–603. 6. Bashutski JD, D’Silva NJ, Wang HL. Implant compression necrosis: current understanding and case report. → J Periodontol. 2009 Apr;80(4):700–4. 7. Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):467–71. 8. Coelho PG, Takayama T, Yoo D, Jimbo R, Karunagaran S, Tovar N, Janal MN, Yamano S. Nanometer-scale features on micrometer-scale surface texturing: a bone histological, gene expression, and nanomechanical study. → Bone. 2014 Aug;65:25–32. 9. Jimbo R, Tovar N, Marin C, Teixeira HS, Anchieta RB, Silveira LM, Janal MN, Shibli JA, Coelho PG. The impact of modified cutting flute implant design on osseointegration. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jul;43(7):883–8. 10. Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, Cabral AM. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Sep-Oct;20(5):769–76. 11. Suaid FA, Novaes AB Jr, Queiroz AC, Muglia VA, Almeida AL, Grisi MF. Buccal bone plate remodeling, after immediate implants with or without synthetic bone grafting and flapless surgery: a histomorphometric and fluorescence study in dogs. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Feb;25(2):e10–21. 12. Teughels W, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:134–45. 13. Schultz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. → Trials [Internet]. 2010 Mar 24 [cited 2016 Nov 14];11:Article 32 [8 p.]. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-11-32. 14. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990 Dec;1(1):33–40. 15. Khayat PG, Arnal HM, Tourbah BI, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of dental implants placed with high insertion torques (up to 176 Ncm). → Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Apr;15(2):227–33. 16. Barone A, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study. → J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):219–26. 17. Needleman I, Chin S, O’Brien T, Petrie A, Donos N. Systematic review of outcome measurements and reference group(s) to evaluate and compare implant success and failure. → J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39 Suppl 12:122–32. 18. Degidi M, Daprile G, Piattelli A. Determination of primary stability: a comparison of the surgeon’s perception and objective measurements. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 May-Jun;25(3):558–61. 19. Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):837–49. 20. Norton MR. The influence of insertion torque on the survival of immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Nov-Dec;26(6):1333–43. 21. Grandi T, Garuti G, Guazzi P, Tarabini L, Forabosco A. Survival and success rates of immediately and early loaded implants; 12-month results from a multicentric randomized clinical study. → J Oral Implantol. 2012 Jun;38(3):239–49. 22. Berardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, Rutjes AW, Caputi S. The effects of high insertion torque versus low insertion torque on marginal bone resorption and implant failure rates: a systematic review with meta-analyses. → Implant Dent. 2016 Aug;25(4):532–40. 23. Lops D, Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Procopio RM, Oteri G. Behaviour of soft tissues healing around single bone-level-implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. A 1 year prospective cohort study. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Nov;24(11):1206–13. References Volume 2 | Issue 4/201673