Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2017-01-11, 10:22:38 | version 1.38.0
Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 2 | Issue 4/2016 25 O p e n h e a l i n g : A r e t r o s p e c t i v e a n a l y s i s 1. Von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(4):359–66. 2. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, Terheyden H, Holmstrup P. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio- Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: a systematic review. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(3):263–73. 3. Urban IA, Nagursky H, Lozada JL, Nagy K. Horizontal ridge augmentation with a collagen membrane and a combination of particulated autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone-derived mineral: a prospective case series in 25 patients. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013;33(3):299–307. 4. Chen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of non-submerged immediate implants: clinical outcomes and esthetic results. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(5):552–62. 5. Ackermann KL. Extraction site management using a natural bone mineral containing collagen: rationale and retrospective case study. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009;29(5):489–97. 6. Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, Friedland B, Schenk RK, Parma-Benfenati S, Simion M, Tinti C, Wagenberg B. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2006;26(1):19–29. 7. Perelman-Karmon M, Kozlovsky A, Liloy R, Artzi Z. Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorb- able collagen membrane. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(4):459–65. 8. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(4):421–30. 9. Jung RE, Fenner N, Hämmerle CH, Zitzmann NU. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(10):1065–73. 10. Buser D, Chappuis V, Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Frei M, Belser UC. Long-term stability of contour augmentation with early implant placement following single tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: a prospective, cross-sectional study in 41 patients with a 5- to 9-year follow-up. → J Periodontol. 2013;84(11):1517–27. 11. Jensen SS, Bosshardt DD, Gruber R, Buser D. Long-term stability of contour augmentation in the esthetic zone: histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of 12 human biopsies 14 to 80 months after augmentation. → J Periodontol. 2014;85(11):1549–56. 12. Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Bone augmentation by means of barrier membranes. → Periodontol 2000. 2003;33:36–53. 13. Dahlin C, Andersson L, Linde A. Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991;2(4):159–65. 14. Dahlin C, Lekholm U, Linde A. Membrane- induced bone augmentation at titanium implants. A report on ten fixtures followed from 1 to 3 years after loading. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991;11(4):273–81. 15. Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, Zaffe D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994;14(2):166–80. 16. Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. → Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(6):844–52. 17. Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. → J Periodontol. 2001;72(4):512–6. doi:10.1902/ jop.2001.72.4.512. 18. Tal H, Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Moses O. Long-term bio-degradation of cross-linked and non-cross-linked collagen barriers in human guided bone regeneration. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(3):295–302. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01424.x. 19. Becker J, Al-Nawas B, Klein MO, Schliephake H, Terheyden H, Schwarz F. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants: a prospective, randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(7):742–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01689.x. 20. Tan-Chu JH, Tuminelli FJ, Kurtz KS, Tarnow DP. Analysis of buccolingual dimensional changes of the extraction socket using the “ice cream cone” flapless grafting technique. → Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34(3):399–403. doi:10.11607/prd.1605. 21. Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):210–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01100.x. 22. Oh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):80–90. 23. Filipek D, Koszowski R, Smieszek-Wilczewska J. A comparative clinical study on human tooth extractions: flap vs flapless buccal surgery. → Quintessence Int. 2012;43(10):887–9. 24. Lang NP, Tonetti MS, Suvan JE, Pierre Bernard J, Botticelli D, Fourmousis I, Hallund M, Jung R, Laurell L, Salvi GE, Shafer D, Weber HP; European Research Group on Periodontology. Immediate implant placement with transmucosal healing in areas of aesthetic priority. A multicentre randomized-controlled clinical trial I. Surgical outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(2):188–96. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01371.x. 25. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wüstefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, Becker J. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence- type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. → Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(4):402–15. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01486.x. References Volume 2 | Issue 4/201625