Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation No. 2, 2016

Journal of Oral Science & Rehabilitation Volume 2 | Issue 2/2016 23 T h r e e - y e a r r e s u l t s o f A l l - o n - 4 i n d a i l y p r a c t i c e Total Males 12 (40.00%) Females 18 (60.00%) Mean age at implant placement 67.4 ± 6.9 Smokers (< 10 cigarettes/day) 5 (16.67%) Patients treated in the maxilla 12 (40.00%) Patients treated in the mandible 18 (60.00%) Patients treated using guided surgery 15 (50.00%) Patients treated using conventional surgery 15 (50.00%) Post-extraction implants 19 (15.83%) 10.0 mm implant length 14 (11.67%) 11.5 mm implant length 42 (35.00%) 13.0 mm implant length 62 (51.67%) 15.0–16.0 mm implant length 2 (1.67%) Patients with prosthesis failures 0 Patients with implant failures 1 (3.33%) Patients with complications 11 (36.67%) Follow-up period Baseline to 1 year 1–2 years 2–3 years Baseline to 3 years 1.16±0.40 (0.92–1.20) 0.21±0.11 (0.16–0.24) 0.16±0.07 (0.13–0.17) 1.52±0.41 (1.27–1.57) Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 1 Patients’ and interventions’ characteristics. Table 2 Mean marginal bone loss ± standard deviation (mm) (95% CI) between follow-up examinations. Table 3 Three-year marginal bone loss ± standard deviation (mm) according to the jaw location and type of surgery. † Unpaired t-test assuming normal distribution. Location Mandible (n=18) Maxilla (n=12) P-value† 1.54±0.46 1.49±0.34 P=0.756 Type of surgery Guided (n=15) Freehand (n=15) P-value† 1.48±0.47 1.55±0.34 P=0.365 Volume 2 | Issue 2/201623 1.54±0.461.49±0.34 P=0.756 1.48±0.471.55±0.34 P=0.365

Pages Overview