Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2016-03-24, 17:16:09 | version 1.38.0
research | 211 2016 implants “Favor small diameter implants.” 3-D positioning As regards replacement of a lateral maxillary in cisor, the tolerances for the location of the implant are very small because of the narrow width of the implant corridor. Two recent meta-analysis13,14 con cerning the precision of surgical guides resulting from 3-D imagery, even if these do not apply spe cifically to the lateral incisor replacement, has found a deviation in the order of a millimetre at the point the implant emerges and 4 to 5 degrees as regards the drilling axis. For Van Assche et al.,14 the average imprecision at the apex of the implant is 1.24 mm. Since these measurements are incompatible with a 12 or 22 implant corridor, it is important to check the first drill hole(s) during the operation, whether the surgery is guided or being carried out freehand. If the implant clinic does not have retro alveolar X-ray equipment, portable generators such as the AnyRay II (VATECH) are available on the market, which allow you to produce intraoperative images (Fig. 16). Fig. 25: Tissue integration with ceramic crown. Fig. 26: Vestibular bulge obtained with modified flap. Fig. 25 Fig. 26 Become an author for implants— international magazine of oral implantology Please contact: Georg Isbaner Editorial manager g.isbaner@oemus-media.de | research Basic evaluation of an antimicrobial gel for peri-implantitis treatment | case report The indispensable use of CBCT in the posterior mandible | industry Automatic crestal sinus lift by motorised impaction device implantsinternational magazine of oral implantology issn 1868-3207 Vol. 17 • Issue 1/2016 12016 Publish your expertise! Oemus_Autorenanzeige_210x148_en_Layout 1 16.03.16 13:51 Seite 1 AD 2112016 Oemus_Autorenanzeige_210x148_en_Layout 116.03.1613:51 Seite 1