Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2015-10-09, 14:58:35 | version 1.38.0
61:676, 1989. 2. Galen WW, Muella K.: Restoration of the Endodontically Treated To- oth. In Cohen, S. Burns, RC., editors: Pathways of the Pulp, 10th Edition. 3. Stankiewicz NR, Wilson PR. The fer- rule effect: a literature review. Int Endod J, 35:575–581, 2002. 4. Galen WW, Mueller KI: Restoration of the Endodontically Treated To- oth. In Cohen, S. Burns, RC, editors: Pathways of the Pulp, 8th Edition. St. Louis: Mosby, Inc. 2002, page 771. 5. Ichim I, Kuzmanovic DV, Love RM.: A finite element analysis of ferrule design on restoration resistance and distribution of stress within a root. Int Endod J. 2006 Jun;39(6): 443–452. 6. Nicholls JI. An engineering appro- ach to the rebuilding of endodonti- cally treated teeth, J Clin Dent, 1:41–44, 1995. 7. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI: Load fati- gue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodontics 8:155–161, 1995. 8. Freeman MA, Nicholls JI, Kydd WL, Harrington GW: Leakage associated with load fatigue-induced prelimi- nary failure of full crowns placed over three different post and core systems. J Endod 24:26–32, 1998. 9. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF Jr.: Recurrent apical periodontitis and late endo- dontic treatment failure related to coronal leakage: a case report. J En- dod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1171–5. doi: 10.1016/ j.joen.2011.05.025. 10. De Moor R1, Hommez G.: [The im- portance of apical and coronal le- akage in the success or failure of endodontic treatment]. Rev Belge Med Dent (1984). 2000;55(4): 334–344. 11. Sritharan A.: Discuss that the coro- nal seal is more important than the apical seal for endodontic success. Aust Endod J. 2002 Dec;28(3): 112–115. 12. Jimenez MP, et al. Fracture resis- tance of endodontically treated te- eth with fiber composite posts. IADR abstract no. 323, March, 2002. 13. Bitter K Kielbassa AM: Post-endo- dontic restorations with adhesively luted fiber-reinforced composite post systems: a review. Am J Dent. 2007 Dec;20(6):353–360. 14. Martinez-Insua A, et al. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulp- less teeth restored with a cast post and core or fiber post with a compo- site core. J Prosthet Dent 80(5), 1998. 15. Al-Ansari A.: Which type of post and core system should you use? Evid Based Dent. 2007;8(2):42. 16. Plotino G, Grande NM, Bedini R, Pa- meijer CH, Somma F.: Flexural pro- perties of endodontic posts and hu- man root dentin. Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1129–35. Epub 2006 Nov 20. 17. Stewardson DA1, Shortall AC, Mar- quis PM, Lumley PJ.: The flexural properties of endodontic post mate- rials. Dent Mater. 2010 Aug;26(8): 730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.den tal.2010. 03.017. Epub 2010 Apr 21. 18. Pierrisnard L, Bohin F, Renault P, Barquins M.: Corono-radi - cular re- construction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite ele- ment analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct; 88(4):442–448. 19. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype Carbon fi- ber reinforced prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17: 599–609. 20. Purton DG, Chandler NP. Rigidity and retention of root canal posts. Br Dent J 1998;184:294–296. 21. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture re- sistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post system at various stages of restorati- on. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26–36. 22. Martínez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the frac- ture strength of pulpless teeth resto- red with a cast post and core or car- bon fiber post with a composite co- re. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527–532. 23. Chieruzzi M, Pagano S, Pennacchi M, Lombardo G, D'Errico P, Kenny JM.: Compressive and flexural be- haviour of fibre reinforced endo- dontic posts. J Dent. 2012 Nov; 40(11):968–78. doi: 10.1016/j. jdent.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Aug 21. 24. Padmanabhan P. A comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of three different pre-fabricated posts in endo - dontically treated te- eth: An in vitro study. J conserve Dent 2010;13:124–128. 25. Maccari PC, Conceição EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodon- tically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthe- tic posts. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15;25–31. DENTAL TRIBUNE Türkiye Baskısı Bilim & Araştırma 7 Dr. Gregori M. Kurtzman Silver Spring, Maryland’da, özel bir genel klinikte çalışmaktadır ve Maryland Üniversitesi'nde eski öğ- retim üyesidir. Restoratif diş hekim- liği, endodonti, implant cerrahisi ve protez, hareketli ve sabit protezler, periodontoloji konularında ulusla- rarası dersler vermiştir. 260’ın üze- rinde yayınlanmış makalesi bulun- maktadır. Genel Diş Hekimliği Aka- demisi, Amerikan İmplant Protez Akademisi, Diş Hekimleri Ameri- kan Koleji, Uluslararası Oral İmp- lantologlar Kongresi, Pierre Fauc- hard Akademi, Uluslararası Diş He- kimliği Akademisi üyesi; Genel Diş Hekimliği Akademisi ve Uluslarara- sı Oral İmplantologlar Kongre- si’nden mastırlı ve Amerikan Den- tal İmplant Derneği ve Uluslararası Oral İmplantologlar Kongresinden diplomalıdır. İletişim Leisure World Plaza Professional Building 3801 International Drive, Suite 102 Silver Spring, MD 20906 ABD drimplants@aol.com Yazışma Adresi Sayfa 6DT