Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2014-11-23, 21:56:20 | version 1.30.01
I case report Fig. 1_Tooth 26, which proved not worth preserving, after root resection. Fig. 2_The state of tooth 26 after extraction. Fig. 3_Implantation after 12 weeks. _In the past ten years, CAD/CAM restorations have been established as standard in implant pros- theses. The advantages of such restorations include the chairside use of full ceramics and digital impres- sions. Owing to the introduction of ceramic blocks with prefabricated twist-proof screw channels, the workflow for the chairside manufacture of individ- ual hybrid abutments and hybrid abutment crowns canbeappliedindailypractice.Bymeansofthecases reported in this article, the indications, suitable ma- terials and attachments, and related studies are dis- cussed. _Case reports Case1 In September 2013, a 35-year-old patient came intoourpracticeforthefirsttime.Thegeneralanam- nesis found no peculiarities. She complained of pain in the second quadrant. The clinical and the radio- logical examination found that tooth 26 was not worth preserving (Fig. 1). The patient was subse- quently informed of the treatment options, which were revision of the root canal filling, and a second root resection and extraction with subsequent im- Permanent implant prostheses Chairside manufacture of a hybrid abutment crown Authors_Dr Arzu Tuna, Dr Umut Baysal & Dr Rainer Valentin, Germany 14 I implants4_2014 Fig. 1 Fig. 3Fig. 2