Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2014-10-09, 17:54:05 | version 1.30.01
27dentistry 3_2014 cosmetic component adhesive system, CLEARFIL SE BOND (Kuraray Noritake). Mesial angles were recontou- red using the standard Hawe celluloid matrix sy- stem (Kerr). The composite surface was prepared and polished using Sof-Lex discs (3M ESPE; Figs. 9a, b). The contours of the veneers for teeth 12 and 22 were checked again using a mock-up, and then minor adjustments were performed. Using a specially trimmed silicone mock-up, the amount of space for the planned ceramic recon- structions was determined and the preparation of teeth was abandoned. After cleaning the teeth with pumice and introducing Ultrapak #00 retraction cord (Ultra- dent) into the gingival sulcus, two-layer single- phase impressions were taken using polyvinyl siloxane impression material (Bisico). Once the final restorations had been recei- ved from the laboratory (Fig. 10), their integrity, match to the abutments and colour were che- cked using a Variolink Try-in paste (Ivoclar Viva- dent). The abutment surfaces were isolated with a rubber dam and cleaned with pumice, then rin- sed thoroughly with water and etched with 37% Figs. 21a-d_Upper incisors after finishing prosthodontic treatment and the two years follow-up. Figs. 22a, b_Bite after finishing treatment and after two years, stable functional and aesthetic result. Figs. 23a-d_Bite after finishing treatment and after two years, stable functional and aesthetic result. Fig. 21a Fig. 21c Fig. 22a Fig. 23a Fig. 23c Fig. 23b Fig. 23d Fig. 21b Fig. 21d Fig. 22b case report _ biomimetic approach