Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download
ePaper created 2014-08-26, 21:44:32 | version 1.30.01
case report _ implant-supported single-tooth restoration I I 29CAD/CAM 3_2014 Fig. 16_After a three-month healing period, the implant was successfully osseointegrated and the soft tissue had stabilised for final impression taking. Fig. 17_The peri-implant soft tissue is well formed and largely irritation free under the temporary bridge. Fig. 18_Good perfusion of the peri-implant soft-tissue well can be observed. Buccal tissue thickness exceeds 3 mm. Fig. 19_Impression taking of the prepared teeth and the implant. Fig. 20_Following reinsertion of the temporary bridge, excess soft tissue was observed in the area of the implant (position 11). Fig. 21_Individual stumps made of super-hard plaster with grooves to prevent rotation were fixed in the impression with instant adhesive. Fig. 22_Preparation of the master model. The wax pins served as access to the stumps on the master model. Fig. 23_The precise periodontal and peri-implant soft-tissue situation was represented on the master model. Fig. 24_The marginal border of the planned implant crown was transferred to the plaster surface. Fig. 25_The peri-implant emergence profile was expanded and the papillae sharpened to provide a harmonious gingival profile. Fig. 26_Optimal hold of the wax-up during try-in through filled implant interface. Fig. 27_Overview of abutment options (from left: CONELOG Esthomic abutment (1.5 to 2.5 mm gingiva height) prior to and after customising, the CONELOG Titanium base CAD/CAM. Fig. 16 Fig. 18Fig. 17 Fig. 19 Fig. 21Fig. 20 Fig. 22 Fig. 24Fig. 23 Fig. 25 Fig. 27Fig. 26 CAD0314_26-32_Happe 22.08.14 14:25 Seite 3