implants - international magazine of oral implantology

recenti pubblicazioni sugli impianti trans-sinu- sali hanno mostrato la possibilità di mantenere ridotte le estensioni protesiche anche quando il seno mascellare occupi l’area dei premolari11,12 . Modeste variazioni di volume del seno ma- scellare (di circa 1 ml) non alterano in maniera significativa la fisiologia del seno mascellare13 . Il caso clinico rappresenta un’ulteriore op- zione terapeutica per ridurre l’invasività chirur- gica degli interventi a livello del seno mascellare, espandendo le classiche indicazioni per l’utilizzo degli impianti angolati. 1. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, editors. Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointe- gration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1985. p. 199-209. 2. Rossetti PH, Bonachela WC, Rossetti LM. Relevant anatomic and biome- chanical studies for implant possibilities on the atrophic maxilla: critical appraisal and literature review. J Prosthodont 2010;19:449-457. 3. Van den Bergh JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res. [Review]. 2000 Jun;11:256-265. 4. Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, Urde G. Failures and complications in 92 consecu- tively inserted overdentures supported by Branemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:162-167. 5. Khayat P, Nader N. The use of osseointegrated implants in the maxillary tuberosity. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:53-61. 6. Venturelli A. A modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the maxil- lary tuberosity: clinical results at 36 months after loading with fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:743-749. 7. Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi SF, 2nd. Analysis of 356 pterygomaxillary implants in edentulous arches for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:398-406. 8. Ferrara ED, Stella JP. Restoration of the edentulous maxilla: the case for the zygomatic implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:1418-1422. 9. Calandriello R, Tomatis M. Simplified treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla via immediate/early function and tilted implants: A prospecti- ve 1-year clinical study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2005;7 Suppl 1:S1-12. 10. Aparicio C, Perales P, Rangert B. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxilla- ry sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2001;3:39-49. 11. Jensen OT, Cottam J, Ringeman J, Adams M. Trans-sinus dental im- plants, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and immediate function for all-on-4 treatment of severe maxillary atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:141-148. 12. Testori T, Mandelli F, Mantovani M, Taschieri S, Weinstein RL, Del Fabbro M. Tilted Trans-Sinus Implants for the Treatment of Maxillary Atrophy: Case Series of 35 Consecutive Patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 Apr 20. 13. Mantovani M. Otorhinolaryngological contraindications in augmentation of the maxillary sinus. In: Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Weinstein RL, Wallace S, editors. Maxillary sinus surgery: Quintessence Publishing; 2009. p. 23-34. _bibliografia expert article _ riabilitazione implantare Consulta gratuitamente la sezione Clinical > articoli scientifici del sito www.dental-tribune.com La notte degli Awards all’Hotel Principe di Piemonte il 13.12.2013 I vincitori dell’articolo scientifico più cliccato sulla piattaforma italiana Dental Tribune verranno premiati! Consulta gratuitamente la sezione Clinical >