Dental Tribune Chinese Edition

www.dentistx.com - 6,7 ; 15 2 Carr ab. successful long-term treat-1. integrated implants: prosthodontic determi¬ nants. int J prosthodont 1998;11(5):502-512 Stanford,c.m. achieving and main- taining predictable implant esthetics through the maintenance of bone around dental implants. compend. contin.educ.Dent. 2002;23(9 suppl 2):13-20 Steinebrunner l. implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and 2. 3. fracture strength of implants. clin oral implants res. 19: 12, 1276-1284 Khraisat a, stegaroiu r, nomura s, miyakawa o. fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 604-610 Maeda Y, satoh T, sogo m. in vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external-hex im- plant-abutment connections: a short communication. J oral rehab 2006; 33: 75-78 4. 5. Merz br, hunenbart s, belser uc. mechanics of the implant-abut- ment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connec- tion. int J oral maxillofac implants. 2000;15(4):519-26 Norton mr. an in vitro evaluation of the strength of an in¬ ternal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design.clin oral impl res 1997: 8: 290-298 Broggini n, mcmanus lm, hermann Js, medina r, schenk rK, buser D, cochran Dl. peri-implant inflam- mation de¬ fined by the implant- abutment interface.J Dent res. 2006 may;85(5):473-8 Kitagawa T, Tanimoto Y, odaki m, nemoto K, aida m. influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system. J biomed mater res b appl biomater 2005; 75b: 457-463 Norton mr. assessment of cold-weld- ing properties of the conical inter- face of two commercially available implant sys¬ tems. J prosthet Dent 1999;81(2):159-166 Http://www.school-for-champions. com/ science/friction_ causes.htm, surface roughness, downloaded on october 1st 2010 Piattelli a, Vrespa G, petrone G, iezzi G, annibali s, scara- no s. role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J periodon- tol 2003; 74: 346-352 Gardner Dm. platoform switching as a means to achieving imlant esthetics. n.Y.state Dent.J.; 71, 3: 34-37 Lazzara rJ, porter ss. platform switch- ing: a new concept in implant den- tistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. int J periodont res Dent 2006; 26: 9-17 Dibart s, Warbington m, fan su m, skobe Z. in vitro evaluation of the implant-abutment bacterial seal: the lock¬ ing taper system. int J oral max- illofac implants 2005; 20: 732-737 Giannopoulou c, effect of intracre- vicular restoration mar¬ gins on peri- implant health: clinical, biochemical, esthetic implants up to 9 years, Jomi, 2003 18 173-181 Bundy KJ. corrosion and other elec- trochemical aspects of biomaterials. critical reviews in biomedical engi- neering, 1994, 22(3/4):139-251 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17.