Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

Dental Tribune United Kingdom Edition

Need advice? Ask the stain removal experts: Beverly Hills Formula is delighted to announce that their Total Protection Whitening toothpaste is proven to be less abrasive than some other leading brands of both whitening and regular toothpastes www.beverlyhillsformula.com sales@beverlyhillsformula.com We’recon dentyou’lllove BeverlyHillsFormulatoothpaste weo er100%moneybackguarantee *seebackofthetoothpastecartonforinformationonmoneybackguarantee Prove it to Yourself - Whiter Teeth in 1 Minute just leave toothpaste on teeth for up to 1 minute before brushing I t is my contention that den- tal associates have suffered the most following the 2006 overhaul of the NHS dental sys- tem. Far from being the beacon of the self employed world in full control of what goes into the pa- tient’s mouth at the point of de- livery, dental associates are now more commonly finding them- selves tenuously close to the definition of an employee, being told how many points are need- ed to be collected every month, the value of each point irrespec- tive of how hard it is to achieve it and increasingly what work they can and cannot carry out on the NHS. The official term ‘perform- er’ clearly does not do justice to the complex and intricate relationship between a den- tist (or any healthcare pro- fessional) and their patients. Whilst technically associates are ‘performing’ a service, this service is almost impossible to perform to best practice guide- lines within the auspices of only three bands. Whilst a label is just a label, I am concerned that the respect of associates within the profession is slowly disintegrating. Labels have an emotional attachment for many people, so as a profession what do we want, dentists practising their profession or performing within a contract? In a recent job advert placed online by an unnamed corpo- rate group, the position was for an associate GDP to ‘perform’ 8,613 UDAs for a ‘competitive’ salary and a 50 per cent con- tribution for lab fees. Sounds pleasant, but how will this work? If we assume that one takes six weeks off work for holidays and one week for CPD, this works out 38.3 UDAs per day needing to be achieved for the target to be met. I’m sure some will think ‘fine’, whilst others may frown, however one thing that I really can’t figure out is how on earth this relates to clinical need. Can one really carry out 8,613 UDAs a year without knowing how much actual dentistry is needed to meet their allocation or does this simply place an unfair and perverse incentive on the den- tist in order to ‘perform’ their associate agreement? Let’s not forget that many of these UDAs will often include ‘new patients’, who could re- quire a ridiculous amount of work in order to achieve three or 12 UDAs. What sort of in- centive does this place on as- sociates aiming to meet their UDA allocations: large fillings or gold onlays? Treat all cavi- ties or watch some? Available on the NHS or Private only? Root canal therapy or extrac- tion? Of course as a mere den- tist, I dare not suggest that clinical decisions are being af- fected by financial incentives rather than the patient’s best interest. Thankfully the Health Select Committee did that for me (2nd July 2008). Along with completely irrele- vant UDA targets with little sensi- ble link to treatment need, dental Performing Dentistry Neel Kothari discusses UDAs and Associates “I’m sure some will think ‘fine’, whilst others may frown, however one thing that I really can’t figure out is how on earth this relates to clinical need” 8 November 12 - 18, 2012United Kingdom EditionComment