Please activate JavaScript!
Please install Adobe Flash Player, click here for download

Dental Tribune United Kingdom Edition

March 26-April 1, 201212 Comment United Kingdom Edition Evolutioninaction The original LED turbine just got even better! But not all LEDs are the same - and we want our customers to have the best. So we are pleased to announce that W&H has raised the bar once again! Improved positioning of the LED source at the head of the handpiece ensures accurate bright illumination of your treatment site. The new LED+ also has an unparalleled Colour Rendering Index (CRI) giving colours a supremely natural feel. And Synea has a small head too, so your daylight quality light will not be obscured by your handpiece. Contact W&H today to see things more clearly with Synea LED+. W&H (UK) Limited 6 Stroud Wood Business Centre Park Street, St Albans HertfordshireAL22NJ,UnitedKingdom t +44 (0) 1727 874990 f +44 (0) 1727 874628 e office.uk@wh.com wh.com ISO 9001: 2008 Certificate No. FS 36436 + *Conditions apply Synea offers an unbeatable range of handpieces to meet the needs of our customers. This range includes W&H’s revolutionary range of LED handpieces. AndallthisfromthesterilizerwiththefastesttrueBcycleonthemarket! ContactW&HtodayforadviceonhowtocomplywithHTM01-05theLisaway. W&H(UK)Limited 6StroudWoodBusinessCentre ParkStreet,StAlbans HertfordshireAL22NJ,UnitedKingdom t+44(0)1727874990 f+44(0)1727874628 eoffice.uk@wh.com wh.com ISO 9001: 2000 Certificate No. FS 36436 Registered Member HTM01-05simplified! AndallthisfromthesterilizerwiththefastesttrueBcycleonthemarket! ContactW&HtodayforadviceonhowtocomplywithHTM01-05theLisaway. W&H(UK)Limited 6StroudWoodBusinessCentre ParkStreet,StAlbans HertfordshireAL22NJ,UnitedKingdom t+44(0)1727874990 f+44(0)1727874628 eoffice.uk@wh.com wh.com ISO 9001: 2000 Certificate No. FS 36436 Registered Member HTM01-05simplified! Unbelievable Value: Buy four W&H Synea Handpieces & receive the least expensive FREE* A4 Indesign.indd 1 19/12/2011 16:36 A s we are all too aware, there is almost not a week that goes by without some form of dentistry-related scare story hitting the headlines of the national press. For the most part, these stories seem to embody everything that’s bad in the world – they play upon the fears and concerns of the gen- eral public and work to support the stereotypes of greedy and sexually-depraved healthcare professionals. I can’t help but wonder then, if these stories re- ally are in the best interests of the public, if they really do work for the national good. Many will have seen the scare story that hit the head- lines recently surrounding the US dentist accused of medical fraud. In the news story – re- ported by a number of sources – a former dentist in the USA pleaded guilty to using sec- tions of paperclips instead of stainless steel posts in a pa- tient’s root canals. While I can never for a moment condone such a case of clear malprac- tice I do worry that these sorts of stories are not construc- tive to the message of good practice that we are trying so hard to convey to our pa- tients. Endodontics already has a very poor press, and to be compounded by a dentist claiming large sums for put- ting something so cheap and nasty in something obviously so delicate is quite alarming. Interestingly, the use of pre-fabricated stainless steel posts has been quite common in dentistry over the years. Historically, some dentists (guilty as charged – but a long time ago) have even been known to use paper clips for post impressions, with posts being made of gold and vari- ous less “blingy” alloys lasting for years. Colleagues will be aware that the success of any endo- dontic treatment is down to the effective cleaning of the canals, with practitioners en- suring the canal is then fully sealed to stop further infec- tion. The most alarming as- pect of the paperclip story from our perspective then is not so much that it was a pa- perclip per se, but more that the paperclip would have been non-sterile and would always result in a poor fit, al- lowing bacteria to grow and resulting in discomfort for patient, retreatment or even tooth loss. In the case of this particular story, it will almost certainly lead to jail for the practitioner. Michael Sultan calls for responsible reporting Writing for the greater good ‘While I can never for a moment con- done such a case of clear malpractice I do worry that these sorts of stories are not constructive to the message of good practice’